tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753026395139707227.post2712672413200435993..comments2024-01-10T10:07:29.412+05:30Comments on Law-in-Perspective: Time to undo 'historical injustice' to Tribals in India: Supreme CourtUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753026395139707227.post-60953004525845066182011-01-10T20:43:54.168+05:302011-01-10T20:43:54.168+05:30Dear Sindhu,
You are bang on. However this is not...Dear Sindhu,<br /><br />You are bang on. However this is not the first time that this has happened. You may as well browse our earlier post with similar notings. <br /><br />http://legalperspectives.blogspot.com/2010/10/live-in-relationships-supreme-court.html<br /><br />:)Tarun Jainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04011672832281826827noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753026395139707227.post-84429727559044083102011-01-10T17:15:07.549+05:302011-01-10T17:15:07.549+05:30" In Google ‘The original inhabitants of Indi..." In Google ‘The original inhabitants of India’, it is mentioned : <br />“A number of earlier anthropologists held the view that the Dravidian peoples together were a distinct race. However, comprehensive genetic studies have proven that this is not the case. The original inhabitants of India may be identified with the speakers of the Munda languages, which are unrelated to either Indo-Aryan or Dravidian languages”"<br /><br />I don't believe this. We learn at law school not to rely upon Wikipedia as an authority and the SC goes ahead and does just that. It quotes Google search and the first result that turns up, Wikipedia, as an authority.Sindhu Shankarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15343276960542191150noreply@blogger.com